Blogs
At Brown Packaging, we provide insightful content about the packaging industry to keep our clients, followers, and partners informed with the latest trends and accurate information. Our goal is to equip you with up-to-date knowledge that helps you stay ahead in the ever-evolving world of packaging.
A POP display isn’t successful when it looks good leaving production—it’s successful when it arrives intact, gets placed correctly, and performs in-store. The problem is
Print is one of the biggest cost drivers in POP displays—and one of the most misunderstood. Most decisions are made based on how it looks,
There’s no universal “better” option—but there is a better fit depending on your program. Brands often default to flat-pack to save on freight or pre-assembled
Most packaging cost discussions focus on unit price. Very few quantify the financial impact of obsolete inventory. Yet for many brands and industrial programs, packaging
Most brands invest in POP displays without clearly measuring performance. They look at sales after rollout and assume the display worked—or didn’t. But without isolating
Most cost-cutting in POP displays happens in the wrong place. Brands reduce board grade, simplify structure too aggressively, or cut print quality—only to see: Higher
Oil prices don’t just affect fuel—they ripple through nearly every part of packaging. When oil rises, packaging costs follow.When oil drops, costs don’t always fall
Most POP display failures aren’t caused by weak materials—they’re caused by poor weight distribution. A display can use the right board, the right flute, and
Not all retail environments are the same—and your POP display shouldn’t be either. What works in big box retail often fails in specialty stores, and
Bigger doesn’t always mean better. Many brands default to floor displays because they assume more visibility equals more sales. But in many retail environments, counter
Retail-ready packaging (RRP) and POP displays are often treated as interchangeable. On paper, they both improve product presentation and efficiency. In reality, they serve completely
Companies managing multiple SKUs often face the challenge of balancing protection, efficiency, and cost in their packaging systems. Custom inserts can be designed with modularity
Many packaging programs grow bloated over time, with dozens of overlapping box sizes, materials, and formats. While this may seem flexible, it often increases costs,
The conversation around affordability has changed. Brands aren’t just trying to spend less — they’re trying to spend smarter while maintaining the same level of
In today’s cost-sensitive market, brands face a double challenge: protecting margins without eroding consumer confidence. When packaging fails — whether through damage, overuse of materials,
The packaging industry has spent decades chasing “more.” More layers, more coatings, more colors — all to create perceived value. But in 2026, the smartest
Packaging decisions should never be based on design alone. Without proper testing, even well-engineered boxes can fail under real-world conditions—leading to product damage, returns, and
The Regular Slotted Container (RSC) is the most widely used corrugated box style, valued for its efficiency and versatility. However, it isn’t always the right
Full Overlap (FOL) corrugated boxes are valued for their durability, with overlapping flaps that add protection on the top and bottom panels. But the strength
Full Overlap (FOL) corrugated boxes are engineered for strength. Unlike a Regular Slotted Container (RSC), the major flaps on an FOL extend the full width
Product damage during transit is one of the most significant hidden costs in packaging. Each damaged shipment increases returns, erodes customer trust, and raises overall