Blogs

Every brand is feeling the squeeze — higher raw material costs, volatile freight rates, and a consumer base more price-conscious than ever. But cutting packaging budgets blindly can lead to damaged goods, compliance issues, and eroded brand value. Smart brands aren’t chasing cheaper boxes — they’re making smarter packaging decisions that balance performance, cost, and perception. The difference between saving money and losing value comes down to how you evaluate your packaging, not just what you pay for it. Beyond Unit Price: Understanding Total Packaging Cost A low unit price might look great on paper — until you factor in assembly time, damage rates, and freight efficiency. Smart packaging evaluation considers the total cost of ownership, including: Material yield (how efficiently sheets convert into boxes) Pallet and trailer utilization (freight optimization) Labor efficiency (ease of assembly or automation compatibility) Product protection (damage rates, replacements, and returns) When buyers assess all these metrics, the lowest-cost box often isn’t the best-value box. Material Selection That Saves in the Long Run Switching materials isn’t just about cutting cost — it’s about reducing waste and improving performance. For instance, moving from double-wall to a high-performance single-wall with better flute structure can cut weight and shipping cost without sacrificing protection. In folding cartons, substrate optimization — using a lighter caliper SBS or switching to coated recycled board — can yield savings that scale across production runs. And for rigid boxes, structural tweaks like thinner chipboard paired with strong wrap papers can preserve presentation while reducing material use. Every small change adds up when you scale across thousands of units. Design Efficiency: The Overlooked Cost Saver A smart structural design can eliminate cost before production even starts. Simplifying folds, reducing glue flaps, or reengineering inserts can cut assembly time and material waste. Modern packaging engineers use CAD-based dieline analysis to optimize layouts — ensuring maximum sheet yield and minimal offcut. For e-commerce and retail brands alike, right-sizing packaging improves shipping efficiency and reduces filler materials while maintaining the brand’s polished look. It’s not just design — it’s design that earns its keep Printing Smart: Matching the Process to the Purpose Not every job needs premium litho or complex spot varnishes. A good packaging partner matches print method to scale and brand intent: Flexo printing for high-volume, cost-efficient runs. Digital printing for short runs, personalization, and multi-SKU campaigns. Litho laminating for high-end visuals in rigid or premium retail displays. By choosing the right print method early, brands can avoid over-engineering — saving both time and money without compromising quality. Data-Driven Decisions: The New Standard for Packaging Buyers Leading companies now use data to guide packaging spend. Damage rate metrics, SKU-level freight analysis, and consumer perception studies all contribute to smarter choices. Smart buyers are no longer asking, “What’s the cheapest box?” They’re asking, “What’s the most efficient box that protects the product, ships well, and supports brand goals?” This mindset shift is what separates cost-cutting from cost control. The Brown Packaging Approach At Brown Packaging, we help brands make smarter packaging decisions by combining engineering analysis, supplier network leverage, and real-world testing. Our process aligns packaging performance with total cost goals — from box design to print selection and logistics. The result: stronger packaging, lower waste, and sustainable cost savings that scale with your business. Because in today’s market, smart packaging isn’t just a cost center — it’s a competitive advantage. References PMMI. (2025). Operational Cost Efficiency in Packaging and Logistics. McKinsey & Company. (2024). Total Cost of Ownership in Consumer Goods Packaging. Packaging World. (2025). Data-Driven Decisions in Packaging Sourcing. Soroka, W. (2009). Fundamentals of Packaging Technology (4th ed.). (714)300-0650 request@brownpackaging.com Most Recent Posts: Categories: Corrugated Ecommerce ESD Design Display Flexible Packaging Foam Folding Carton Packaging Plastic Packaging Pouch Printing Protection Retail Rigid Box Thermoform Sustainability Subscribe To Our Newsletter By submitting your information, you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy. Custom Packaging Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Relevant Posts

As tariff changes reshape global trade, packaging buyers moving production from China to the U.S. or nearshore regions face a new challenge: supplier qualification. Transitioning supply doesn’t end once a domestic or regional converter is found — it depends on confirming quality, compliance, capacity, and reliability. A single weak supplier can eliminate the cost advantage gained from reduced tariffs or freight savings. Why Supplier Auditing Matters in 2026 The surge in reshoring and nearshoring caused by tariff uncertainty has increased demand for North American converters. Many new facilities are expanding quickly to capture this business, but not all meet the compliance, traceability, or process control standards expected by industrial and eCommerce packaging buyers. A structured audit process ensures: Consistent quality across corrugated, folding carton, or display production. Regulatory compliance with ASTM, ISO, and FSC® standards. Supply continuity through verified capacity and certified material sources. Accurate cost forecasting to reflect total landed cost and risk reduction. Pre-Audit Research and Documentation Before engaging new suppliers, buyers should compile baseline criteria and supporting documentation to maintain sourcing consistency: FSC®, SFI®, and ISO certification requirements Corrugated and paperboard testing standards (ECT, BCT, TAPPI) Reference samples, structural specs, and assembly instructions Forecasted volumes, replenishment schedule, and SKU priorities This preparation allows accurate comparison between U.S., nearshore, and legacy overseas programs. Key Stages of a Packaging Supplier Audit Facility Review and Process Mapping Perform a virtual or on-site walkthrough to evaluate: Equipment (corrugator, folder-gluer, digital press, die cutter) Preventive maintenance and production uptime Quality checkpoints during converting and finishing Level of in-house vs. subcontracted work Detailed process mapping reveals throughput potential and operational control. Quality and Compliance Verification Request verifiable documentation that supports performance and sustainability claims: FSC® or SFI® Chain of Custody certificates ISO 9001:2015 or 14001 systems ECT, BCT, and Mullen test reports for corrugated ISTA or ASTM validation for shipping durability A supplier’s ability to present accurate, dated certifications is often a clear indicator of overall discipline. Material Sourcing Transparency Tariff classification depends on component origin, so material traceability is essential. Audit material flow from paper mills to finished packaging: Country of origin for linerboard and medium Source of inks, coatings, and adhesives Validation of recycled or sustainable content claims Suppliers unable to verify their raw material chain risk future tariff reclassification or customs delays. Capacity and Lead Time Validation Tariff-related reshoring has increased demand across North America, making production capacity a top qualification factor. Validate claims by testing: True throughput on pilot orders Changeover and setup times On-time performance during seasonal peaks Verified capacity ensures consistent delivery and pricing stability throughout tariff cycles. Communication and Issue Resolution Responsiveness directly impacts speed to market. During onboarding, evaluate: Response time for quotes and samples Accuracy of proofing and revision cycles Corrective action tracking for defects or misprints Suppliers with strong internal communication typically maintain better production accuracy and customer satisfaction. Financial and Operational Stability Rapid industry expansion brings new entrants, not all of whom are financially stable. Review: Operating history and client references Insurance, certifications, and credit terms Equipment investment and future growth plan Financially grounded suppliers reduce the risk of production interruptions during tariff-driven market shifts. Integrating Audited Suppliers into Procurement Systems Once qualified, add new suppliers into procurement systems with metrics for: On-time delivery and defect rate Price stability and freight consistency Certification renewal schedules Environmental and compliance documentation Quarterly supplier scorecards help maintain consistency and verify ongoing readiness as tariff conditions evolve. Final Considerations for Buyers As tariffs continue to influence global sourcing, the strongest packaging programs will combine regional diversification with rigorous supplier auditing. Buyers who integrate traceability, compliance, and performance verification into procurement can maintain cost stability and tariff protection without compromising quality. References U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC). Trade Policy Developments 2026. Institute of Packaging Professionals (IoPP). Supplier Qualification Guidelines. International Safe Transit Association (ISTA). Testing Standards for Transport Packaging. Forest Stewardship Council (FSC®). Chain of Custody Certification Requirements. (714)300-0650 request@brownpackaging.com Most Recent Posts: Categories: Corrugated Ecommerce ESD Design Display Flexible Packaging Foam Folding Carton Packaging Plastic Packaging Pouch Printing Protection Retail Rigid Box Thermoform Sustainability Subscribe To Our Newsletter By submitting your information, you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy. Custom Packaging Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Relevant Posts

With new tariff proposals and continued trade uncertainty, 2026 is shaping up to be another pivotal year for packaging sourcing strategy. Many companies that shifted production away from China in 2024–2025 are now reassessing cost structures between nearshore and fully domestic manufacturing. While both options reduce tariff exposure, each carries different implications for labor, logistics, compliance, and scalability. Why Cost Comparison Matters in 2026 As global trade policy remains unpredictable, packaging buyers must balance cost efficiency with reliability. Nearshore manufacturing — primarily in Mexico and Canada — offers competitive labor rates and regional proximity, while U.S. converters provide faster lead times, stricter compliance, and integrated fulfillment capabilities. The goal for 2026 is not just lower cost per unit, but optimized total landed cost with minimal risk. Key Cost Factors to Evaluate Labor and Production Efficiency Labor costs continue to be a primary advantage for nearshore production. However, increased automation across U.S. facilities is narrowing the gap. Nearshore (Mexico/Canada): Lower base wages, but variable automation and longer setup times for smaller runs. U.S.: Higher labor rates, but shorter turnaround, reduced downtime, and higher throughput through robotics and digital converting lines. By 2026, modern U.S. converters using digital die cutting, inline gluing, and automated case packing can rival nearshore cost per finished unit once efficiency is factored. Freight and Transit Time Freight volatility remains a major cost driver. With fewer ocean shipments, both nearshore and domestic programs gain predictability, but domestic manufacturing provides the most control. Source Region Average Transit Time Typical Freight (West Coast) Mexico → U.S. 2-5 days Moderate (border clearance dependent) Canada → U.S. 2-5 days Moderate U.S. Domestic 1–3 days Low (regional or inter-state) Faster delivery reduces demurrage, storage, and replenishment delays — a growing cost consideration for multi-SKU packaging programs. Material and Substrate Availability Material flow remains a major differentiator: Mexico: Expanding board and film production but still imports some adhesives and coatings from the U.S. Canada: Strong pulp and FSC® paperboard infrastructure with sustainability advantages. U.S.: Full domestic substrate ecosystem including corrugated, folding carton, and flexible film production. Domestic converters maintain the most resilient material supply, reducing risk from international component dependencies. Quality Control and Waste Reduction For 2026 buyers, consistent print accuracy and die precision matter as much as cost. Nearshore suppliers often deliver competitive quality but may lack full ISO or GMI auditing. U.S. manufacturers increasingly operate under ISO 9001:2015 or G7 Master Printer certification, reducing rejects and non-conformance. Even small rework or print errors can offset initial savings, making quality stability a financial factor rather than a cosmetic one. Compliance, ESG, and Reporting With increased scrutiny on sustainability claims, domestic production simplifies documentation and compliance. U.S.: Transparent traceability for recycled content, FSC® verification, and carbon accounting. Nearshore: Improving ESG frameworks, though validation processes can be slower or fragmented. For brands selling through major retailers, U.S.-based sourcing often shortens ESG audit cycles and meets evolving corporate responsibility standards. Currency, Trade, and Policy Stability Even under the USMCA framework, exchange rates and local policy shifts affect nearshore pricing. Domestic production avoids foreign exchange risk and ensures stable compliance documentation as tariff adjustments continue. Total Landed Cost Comparison (2026 Estimate) Cost Component China Import (Baseline) Nearshore U.S. Domestic Unit Price Low Moderate Slightly Higher Freight & Tariffs High Low None Lead Time 6–8 weeks 1–2 weeks 2–5 days Quality Control Variable Moderate High Compliance Risk High Moderate Low Total Landed Cost (Est.) 100% baseline 85–90% 90–95% This demonstrates that by 2026, both nearshore and U.S. production can outperform Chinese imports once freight, tariffs, and quality consistency are included. When to Choose Nearshore vs. U.S. Manufacturing Nearshore (Mexico/Canada): Ideal for medium to high volume packaging with extended lead time flexibility and lower labor sensitivity. U.S. Manufacturing: Best for just-in-time fulfillment, high-mix SKU programs, and packaging tied to strict compliance or retail testing. Many brands now combine both — running bulk corrugated or folding carton production nearshore while keeping display assembly, printing, and co-packing domestic for faster deployment. Final Outlook for 2026 As tariffs, freight rates, and ESG requirements evolve, hybrid sourcing models will dominate packaging procurement. The most resilient programs will integrate nearshore cost advantages with domestic quality control and logistics precision. In 2026, total cost efficiency comes not from chasing the lowest price — but from designing a supply chain that balances tariff protection, reliability, and sustainability. References U.S. International Trade Administration (ITA). USMCA and North American Supply Chain Outlook 2026. International Corrugated Case Association (ICCA). Global Corrugated Industry Report 2026. Forest Stewardship Council (FSC®). Supply Chain and Certification Data. Soroka, W. Fundamentals of Packaging Technology. 6th ed. Institute of Packaging Professionals. (714)300-0650 request@brownpackaging.com Most Recent Posts: Categories: Corrugated Ecommerce ESD Design Display Flexible Packaging Foam Folding Carton Packaging Plastic Packaging Pouch Printing Protection Retail Rigid Box Thermoform Sustainability Subscribe To Our Newsletter By submitting your information, you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy. Custom Packaging Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Relevant Posts

Following multiple rounds of tariff changes and trade policy adjustments, 2026 marks a turning point for U.S. packaging buyers. Many who previously transitioned from China to domestic or nearshore suppliers are now focusing on resilience — ensuring their packaging supply chains remain cost-stable, flexible, and disruption-proof. Tariffs are no longer short-term events; they’re recurring elements of global trade. The companies best positioned for 2026 and beyond are those that treat sourcing diversification and operational agility as core business functions rather than reactive cost-saving measures. Understanding Supply Chain Resilience in Packaging In the packaging industry, resilience means more than just having backup suppliers. It’s about structuring your network, data, and materials so that tariff or freight changes don’t interrupt production or retail fulfillment. A resilient supply chain ensures: Predictable lead times regardless of policy shifts or port congestion. Stable material access through multi-region substrate sourcing. Financial control via cost forecasting that accounts for tariffs, duties, and logistics volatility. Key Strategies to Strengthen Packaging Supply Chains in 2026 Multi-Regional Sourcing Networks Single-country dependence has proven to be one of the highest risks for packaging buyers. Instead of choosing between China, Mexico, or the U.S., the strongest programs build multi-regional sourcing portfolios. For example: Corrugated and carton production split between U.S. and Mexico. Litho-laminated displays or kitting handled domestically for compliance and speed. Paperboard substrates sourced from Canada or domestically for FSC® reliability. This approach balances cost, agility, and compliance while keeping freight predictable. Data-Driven Forecasting and Visibility 2026 buyers are leveraging ERP and procurement software that integrate freight, tariff, and material indices directly into cost projections.Modern systems now automate: Tariff impact simulation based on HS codes. Freight rate modeling across domestic and nearshore routes. Inventory optimization tied to seasonal demand. With this data visibility, procurement teams can react to cost changes in real time — not months after they’ve impacted margins. Inventory and Production Flexibility Flexibility protects against both tariff and logistics shocks. Packaging programs should evaluate: Dual production capability (domestic + nearshore). Dynamic safety stock levels at regional DCs. Modular design formats that adapt to multiple production sites without retooling. Domestic manufacturers now frequently support JIT and kanban systems that align directly with nearshore runs, allowing seamless scale adjustments without full requalification. Strengthening Supplier Collaboration Resilience depends on supplier transparency and shared planning. In 2026, the best-performing packaging networks operate more like strategic partnerships than vendor relationships. Strong collaboration practices include: Quarterly forecasting and capacity reviews. Shared visibility into material allocation and lead times. Mutual quality metrics and audit reporting. Early communication of regulatory or cost changes. These practices reduce last-minute disruptions and build long-term trust across regions. Sustainability as a Risk-Reduction Tool Sustainability and resilience now intersect. FSC® or SFI® certification, recycled substrate sourcing, and verified carbon reporting protect buyers not just from reputational risk but from supply volatility.Sustainability-linked packaging programs typically benefit from: Priority access to certified board mills. Simplified compliance under U.S. and USMCA trade rules. Lower exposure to international environmental tariffs or surcharges. Contingency Planning and Scenario Modeling Resilient supply chains are built on “what if” planning. By modeling multiple tariff and freight outcomes, buyers can determine thresholds for shifting production without disruption. Scenario modeling examples: What if tariffs on imported adhesives rise 20%? What if freight rates increase 15% due to fuel surcharges? What if domestic demand outpaces capacity during Q4 retail season? Companies with contingency playbooks can rebalance production before costs escalate or supply falters. The Role of U.S. Distributors in a Resilient Network Many packaging buyers are centralizing supplier management under one domestic distributor capable of coordinating corrugated, carton, label, and display manufacturing across multiple facilities. This approach: Reduces administrative overhead. Maintains consistent quality across SKUs. Simplifies tariff classification and compliance tracking. Distributors with domestic and nearshore partnerships can dynamically shift production between regions based on lead time, cost, and capacity — ensuring resilience without complexity. Final Takeaway for 2026 Tariff realignment is reshaping global packaging procurement, but it’s also driving modernization. By combining data visibility, diversified sourcing, and strong supplier collaboration, packaging buyers can convert uncertainty into competitive advantage. The future of packaging resilience isn’t about avoiding tariffs — it’s about designing a network that thrives despite them. References U.S. International Trade Administration (ITA). 2026 Packaging Trade and Tariff Outlook. Institute of Packaging Professionals (IoPP). Supply Chain Resilience Framework. Forest Stewardship Council (FSC®). Certification and Traceability Guidelines. Soroka, W. Fundamentals of Packaging Technology. 6th ed. Institute of Packaging Professionals. (714)300-0650 request@brownpackaging.com Most Recent Posts: Categories: Corrugated Ecommerce ESD Design Display Flexible Packaging Foam Folding Carton Packaging Plastic Packaging Pouch Printing Protection Retail Rigid Box Thermoform Sustainability Subscribe To Our Newsletter By submitting your information, you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy. Custom Packaging Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Relevant Posts

Shifting packaging production from China to the U.S. can help stabilize costs, reduce tariff exposure, and shorten lead times. But the transition process requires careful planning. For packaging buyers, the key is to maintain product consistency and supply reliability while minimizing operational disruption. Why Buyers Are Moving Away from China Trade policy volatility and freight instability have pushed many U.S. companies to rethink their packaging sourcing strategy. Rising import duties on corrugated boxes, folding cartons, and flexible films have narrowed the price gap between overseas and domestic suppliers. Primary drivers include: Tariff risk: Section 301 duties on many packaging materials remain in place. Freight volatility: Ocean container rates fluctuate significantly, adding uncertainty. Lead times: Global shipping delays and port congestion disrupt timelines. Quality oversight: Longer supply chains make corrective actions harder to implement. As a result, many buyers are transitioning to U.S. packaging suppliers for improved cost control, compliance, and visibility. Step 1: Evaluate Current Exposure Start by identifying which SKUs, materials, or vendors are tied to China. Document: Country of origin for all packaging components. Annual spend and volumes by supplier. Tariff classification (HTS code) for each SKU. Freight, duty, and logistics costs per shipment. This baseline allows you to calculate your total landed cost, not just unit pricing, and shows where domestic sourcing offers the biggest impact. Step 2: Identify Viable U.S. Suppliers Work with suppliers that can deliver both structural and graphic packaging capabilities within the U.S. Confirm: Available converting and printing processes (flexo, litho-lam, digital). Access to sustainable materials (FSC-certified, post-consumer recycled). Proximity to fulfillment centers or distribution hubs. Experience transitioning overseas programs without downtime. Brown Packaging partners with domestic manufacturers across the U.S. to meet these standards and ensure full program continuity. Step 3: Test and Validate Packaging Before committing to a full rollout, pilot your packaging with a short production run to confirm performance. Match material specs to existing overseas designs. Validate durability under ISTA and ASTM transport testing. Review print registration, color, and finish consistency. Confirm pallet optimization and packing line compatibility. Testing ensures a seamless switch without affecting retail presentation or customer experience. Step 4: Adjust Forecasting and Lead Times Domestic production typically reduces lead times from months to weeks, but requires tighter inventory planning. Build in short buffer windows for material procurement. Align forecasts with your new supplier’s production cadence. Recalculate safety stock based on faster replenishment cycles. This shift improves responsiveness and reduces warehouse carrying costs over time. Step 5: Communicate Internally and Externally Transitioning packaging affects purchasing, logistics, marketing, and compliance teams. Update specifications and vendor databases. Revise packaging artwork to include “Made in USA” where appropriate. Inform key customers of improvements to delivery and reliability. Transparency helps ensure all departments adapt smoothly and maintain consistent packaging performance. Why It Matters for Buyers Transitioning from China to U.S. packaging is a strategic move toward long-term cost stability and supply chain control. Beyond tariff avoidance, it allows for stronger oversight, sustainable sourcing, and improved customer satisfaction. Brown Packaging supports this process by helping businesses identify high-risk imports, match U.S. equivalents, and test performance before scaling.Contact us to start evaluating your packaging transition plan. References Packaging Dive. (2025). Tariffs Continue to Reshape U.S. Packaging Sourcing Strategies. U.S. International Trade Commission. (2025). Section 301 Duty Updates on Packaging Materials. ASTM International. (2023). ASTM D4169: Performance Testing of Shipping Containers. ISTA. (2023). Testing Procedures for Transport Packaging. Fibre Box Association. (2024). Corrugated Packaging Handbook. (714)300-0650 request@brownpackaging.com Most Recent Posts: Categories: Corrugated Ecommerce ESD Design Display Flexible Packaging Foam Folding Carton Packaging Plastic Packaging Pouch Printing Protection Retail Rigid Box Thermoform Sustainability Subscribe To Our Newsletter By submitting your information, you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy. Custom Packaging Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Relevant Posts

Moisture resistance and dimensional stability are critical performance factors for custom inserts, especially when products are shipped or stored in variable climates. Both foam and corrugated materials react differently to humidity, temperature, and long-term environmental exposure, which can impact product fit, cushioning performance, and structural integrity. Impact of Humidity on Corrugated Inserts Corrugated fiberboard is hygroscopic, meaning it naturally absorbs and releases moisture from the surrounding air. This affects compression strength, warping, and dimensional accuracy. In high-humidity environments, standard kraft liners can lose up to 50% of their stacking strength. Coatings, wax treatments, or the use of water-resistant adhesives (meeting TAPPI T-829 standards) can improve performance. Foam Behavior in Moist Environments Closed-cell foams, such as polyethylene (PE) and cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE), resist water absorption and retain their shape under exposure to moisture. Open-cell foams, like polyurethane (PU), are more prone to water ingress, leading to swelling, microbial growth, and loss of cushioning capacity. For products with moisture sensitivity, designers often specify closed-cell foams or integrate vapor-barrier laminations. Dimensional Stability Under Temperature Shifts Foam inserts, particularly those with high thermal expansion coefficients, can either loosen or increase compression on the product. Testing under ASTM D4332 (conditioning) ensures the insert maintains performance across the expected temperature range. Combined Material Designs When foam and corrugated are combined in a hybrid insert, dimensional stability depends on matching materials with similar expansion and contraction profiles. Mismatched materials can cause warping or delamination over time. Selecting adhesives that remain flexible in varying humidity is critical for long-term stability. Designing for Real-World Conditions Inserts should be designed and tested to withstand the extremes of their distribution cycle — from humid seaports to dry inland warehouses. This may involve ISTA 3A/6A testing protocols combined with accelerated aging tests to simulate months of exposure within a compressed timeframe. References American Society for Testing and Materials. (2014). ASTM D4332-14: Standard Practice for Conditioning Containers, Packages, or Packaging Components for Testing. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4332-14International Safe Transit Association. (2018). ISTA 3A Packaged-Products for Parcel Delivery System Shipment 70 kg (150 lb) or Less. https://ista.org/TAPPI. (2023). T-829 Water Resistance of Paperboard by Wax Treatment. https://www.tappi.org/content/store/shared/T829.htmlSoroka, W. (2016). Fundamentals of Packaging Technology (5th ed.). Institute of Packaging Professionals. Key Compliance Requirements Structural standards: Packaging must meet durability and palletization guidelines. Labeling accuracy: GS1-compliant barcodes and proper product details. Sustainability mandates: FSC certification or recyclability requirements from major retailers. Testing protocols: ISTA or ASTM performance tests to validate protection. Packaging Solutions with Brown Packaging Brown Packaging partners with companies to design packaging that meets retailer requirements. From GS1 labeling to FSC-certified materials and ISTA-tested corrugated, we help buyers reduce chargebacks and protect retail relationships. Contact us to improve your retail compliance program. References GS1. (2024). Global Standards for Packaging and Labeling. Retrieved from https://www.gs1.orgInternational Safe Transit Association (ISTA). (2023). ISTA Testing Procedures for Transport Packaging. Retrieved from https://ista.orgForest Stewardship Council (FSC). (2023). FSC Packaging Certification Guidelines. Retrieved from https://fsc.org (714)300-0650 request@brownpackaging.com Most Recent Posts: Subscribe To Our Newsletter By submitting your information, you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy. Custom Inserts Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Relevant Posts