Cutting Packaging Costs Without Sacrificing Protection
As budgets tighten in 2026, packaging buyers are under pressure to reduce costs without increasing damage rates. Cutting too aggressively can lead to product loss, higher return rates, and frustrated customers. The key is balancing material use, box design, and supply chain efficiency so that savings do not come at the expense of protection.
Where Packaging Costs Add Up
- Oversized boxes: Drive dimensional weight charges.
- Excess materials: Overuse of void fill and inserts.
- Complex SKU mix: Redundant sizes increase inventory costs.
- Inefficient freight: Poor palletization and stacking.
Cost-Saving Strategies That Maintain Protection
- Right-sizing: Match box size to product dimensions to cut DIM charges and material use.
- Optimize corrugated grades: Switch to single- or double-wall where appropriate without compromising strength.
- Consolidate SKUs: Streamline packaging options to reduce inventory overhead.
- Efficient inserts: Replace foam or excess dunnage with engineered corrugated or molded pulp.
- Supplier contracts: Negotiate based on annual volumes, not just peak season orders.
Testing Before Implementing Changes
- Use ASTM and ISTA protocols to ensure changes won’t increase product damage.
- Test for compression, vibration, and drop resistance.
- Run pilot shipments before scaling across the supply chain.
Balancing Sustainability and Cost
Eco-friendly doesn’t have to mean expensive:
- Use recyclable coatings to reduce plastic films.
- Choose corrugated designs that require less material while maintaining stacking strength.
- Highlight sustainable solutions in marketing to offset cost concerns.
Packaging Solutions with Brown Packaging
Brown Packaging helps companies lower costs while protecting products across the supply chain. From SKU rationalization to right-sized corrugated solutions, our team ensures packaging savings don’t compromise performance. Contact us to optimize your packaging program.
References
Soroka, W. (2009). Fundamentals of Packaging Technology (4th ed.). Institute of Packaging Professionals.
ASTM International. (2023). ASTM D4169: Standard Practice for Performance Testing of Shipping Containers and Systems.
Sustainable Packaging Coalition. (2023). Packaging Efficiency and Waste Reduction Report. Retrieved from https://sustainablepackaging.org
As budgets tighten in 2026, packaging buyers are under pressure to reduce costs without increasing damage rates. Cutting too aggressively can lead to product loss, higher return rates, and frustrated
Many U.S. businesses currently sourcing packaging from China are facing a harsh reality: tariffs and trade volatility can quickly erode margins and disrupt supply chains. By shifting toward U.S.-based packaging
Rising tariffs and trade restrictions on Chinese manufacturing are accelerating the need for U.S. companies to reevaluate their packaging supply chains. Many packaging buyers who once relied on Chinese corrugated,
POP display design must serve two masters — maximizing visual impact in-store while minimizing logistics costs. Engineering the right balance between display footprint, assembly complexity, and shipping volume is critical
By submitting your information, you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.
The packaging world is vast, catering to various industry needs and requirements. Among the myriad options, Gaylord boxes stand out for their durability, versatility, and
In today’s competitive business landscape, customer loyalty plays a pivotal role in the success and growth of any brand or business. With countless options available
Score cracking—visible fiber breakage along a fold—can ruin a carton’s appearance, weaken its structure, and cause failures on automated lines. Understanding the causes and engineering