Moisture Resistance and Dimensional Stability in Inserts
Moisture resistance and dimensional stability are critical performance factors for custom inserts, especially when products are shipped or stored in variable climates. Both foam and corrugated materials react differently to humidity, temperature, and long-term environmental exposure, which can impact product fit, cushioning performance, and structural integrity.
Impact of Humidity on Corrugated Inserts
Corrugated fiberboard is hygroscopic, meaning it naturally absorbs and releases moisture from the surrounding air. This affects compression strength, warping, and dimensional accuracy. In high-humidity environments, standard kraft liners can lose up to 50% of their stacking strength. Coatings, wax treatments, or the use of water-resistant adhesives (meeting TAPPI T-829 standards) can improve performance.
Foam Behavior in Moist Environments
Closed-cell foams, such as polyethylene (PE) and cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE), resist water absorption and retain their shape under exposure to moisture. Open-cell foams, like polyurethane (PU), are more prone to water ingress, leading to swelling, microbial growth, and loss of cushioning capacity. For products with moisture sensitivity, designers often specify closed-cell foams or integrate vapor-barrier laminations.
Dimensional Stability Under Temperature Shifts
Foam inserts, particularly those with high thermal expansion coefficients, can either loosen or increase compression on the product. Testing under ASTM D4332 (conditioning) ensures the insert maintains performance across the expected temperature range.
Combined Material Designs
When foam and corrugated are combined in a hybrid insert, dimensional stability depends on matching materials with similar expansion and contraction profiles. Mismatched materials can cause warping or delamination over time. Selecting adhesives that remain flexible in varying humidity is critical for long-term stability.
Designing for Real-World Conditions
Inserts should be designed and tested to withstand the extremes of their distribution cycle — from humid seaports to dry inland warehouses. This may involve ISTA 3A/6A testing protocols combined with accelerated aging tests to simulate months of exposure within a compressed timeframe.
References
American Society for Testing and Materials. (2014). ASTM D4332-14: Standard Practice for Conditioning Containers, Packages, or Packaging Components for Testing. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4332-14
International Safe Transit Association. (2018). ISTA 3A Packaged-Products for Parcel Delivery System Shipment 70 kg (150 lb) or Less. https://ista.org/
TAPPI. (2023). T-829 Water Resistance of Paperboard by Wax Treatment. https://www.tappi.org/content/store/shared/T829.html
Soroka, W. (2016). Fundamentals of Packaging Technology (5th ed.). Institute of Packaging Professionals.
Key Compliance Requirements
- Structural standards: Packaging must meet durability and palletization guidelines.
- Labeling accuracy: GS1-compliant barcodes and proper product details.
- Sustainability mandates: FSC certification or recyclability requirements from major retailers.
- Testing protocols: ISTA or ASTM performance tests to validate protection.
Packaging Solutions with Brown Packaging
Brown Packaging partners with companies to design packaging that meets retailer requirements. From GS1 labeling to FSC-certified materials and ISTA-tested corrugated, we help buyers reduce chargebacks and protect retail relationships. Contact us to improve your retail compliance program.
References
GS1. (2024). Global Standards for Packaging and Labeling. Retrieved from https://www.gs1.org
International Safe Transit Association (ISTA). (2023). ISTA Testing Procedures for Transport Packaging. Retrieved from https://ista.org
Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). (2023). FSC Packaging Certification Guidelines. Retrieved from https://fsc.org
As tariff changes reshape global trade, packaging buyers moving production from China to the U.S. or nearshore regions face a new challenge: supplier qualification. Transitioning supply doesn’t end once a
With new tariff proposals and continued trade uncertainty, 2026 is shaping up to be another pivotal year for packaging sourcing strategy. Many companies that shifted production away from China in
Following multiple rounds of tariff changes and trade policy adjustments, 2026 marks a turning point for U.S. packaging buyers. Many who previously transitioned from China to domestic or nearshore suppliers
Shifting packaging production from China to the U.S. can help stabilize costs, reduce tariff exposure, and shorten lead times. But the transition process requires careful planning. For packaging buyers, the
By submitting your information, you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.
Thermoform packaging is the backbone of numerous sectors including food, pharmaceutical, electronics, cosmetics, and consumer goods, to name a few. Its high adaptability and customizability
We all want to protect our products during shipment, but are not quite sure on which product to use, often many of us find ourselves
Packaging foam is essential for protecting products against shocks, vibrations, and other potential damages during transportation and storage. Understanding the different types of packaging foam